|
Shopping for Vitamins
by Todd Luger,
L.Ac.
The majority of vitamin purchases are made at large chain
drugstores and supermarkets. The perception is that there is no great
distinction between vitamins made by different companies. This belief
is only partially true. It is indeed true that the vast majority of vitamin
and mineral products use ingredients manufactured by a few large companies.
However, there are still critical distinctions to be made.
For instance, while most vitamins are synthetically produced,
there is a range of different sources of the chemical precursors one might
use. One of the largest suppliers of vitamins is the Eastman Kodak company,
which is able to chemically alter certain photo processing chemicals in
order to manufacture their ìhealth supplementsî. While research seems
to indicate that the body uses such synthetically produced items in exactly
the same way as those produced by nature, the synthetic products are not
actually identical to the natural ones. Half of synthetically produced
vitamin C is actually a mirror image of the one produced by nature and
these mirror images do not work as vitamins in the body.
Small specialty manufacturers often provide encapsulated
vitamins without additives. Large companies add free-flowing agents and
binders, which may be toxic, and lubricants, which dramatically interfere
with nutrient absorption. If one is seriously ill, please consult an expert
in this area before beginning a supplement program. This can actually
save a lot of money, frustration and adverse reactions, in the long run.
Finally, more isnít always better. Many manufacturers put large numbers
of obscure ingredients in their products, however many of these ingredients
are actually not present in large enough amounts to have much health impact.
Without specific advice from a professional, one should identify a product
that contains adequate quantities of common vitamins (beta-carotene, B's,
C, D, E, K). For specifics, the shopper is referred to the Encyclopedia
of Natural Healing by Murray and Pizzorno.
Like certain vitamins, we must get certain minerals from
our diet for optimal health. In nature minerals occur complexed with amino
acids. Product manufacturers have attempted to mimic this process by combining
minerals with amino acids in the process of chelation. This process increases
the absorption and utilization of minerals. Labels may say amino acid
chelate or perhaps specifically refer to the amino acid, such as aspartate.
Several minerals have been heavily researched and optimum supplementation
levels have been determined. These include calcium, magnesium and zinc.
The dosage of others are more controversial, such as vanadium and molybdenum.
Selenium, which is quite deficient in modern diets, appears to be a potent
antioxidant. As a word of caution, no one should take iron supplements
without a physician's prescription. Solid evidence links excess iron intake
with the development of cancer.
In addition to herbs, there is a whole range of supplements
available, which are neither vitamins, nor minerals. These include items
such as glucosamine sulfate, shark's cartilage, amino acids, DHEA and
melatonin, to name a few. Some of these items are very safe (glucosamine
sulfate), but others have caused concern amongst health professionals
(DHEA and amino acids). While such items are legal for sale without a
prescription, they are not really nutrients. Some are actually more similar
to drugs.
The proper use of these items is highly specific. In
order to get good, safe results with such products, I strongly advise
consulting with a natural healthcare professional. Be extremely wary of
healthfood store personnel who recommend this type of supplement. It is
one thing to make a product available or to recommend the use of a general
multi-vitamin, but Oregon law is very clear. Only a licensed healthcare
provider may recommend a product for the relief of a symptom or a disease.
Anyone who does this should be willing to document their education and
licensure. Otherwise, the health product consumer should always err on
the side of caution.
[back to top]
|